This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [0/10] Replace host_integerp and tree_low_cst
- From: Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford at googlemail dot com>
- To: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 09:08:47 +0000
- Subject: Re: [0/10] Replace host_integerp and tree_low_cst
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <87ppq0tsn4 dot fsf at talisman dot default> <5289A37B dot 6040108 at redhat dot com>
Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> writes:
> On 11/16/13 05:53, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> After the patch that went in yesterday, all calls to host_integerp and
>> tree_low_cst pass a constant "pos" argument. This series replaces each
>> function with two separate ones:
> [ ... ]
> So I've almost entirely ignored the whole wide-int conversion discussion
> and I suspect I'm not entirely alone.
>
> Can you briefly summarize what's y'all are trying to accomplish with the
> wide-int changes?
At the moment, we can only handle tree and rtl integer constants that
fit in 2 HOST_WIDE_INTs. The idea is to remove that limit. E.g. things
like OImode (used in a few ports) will become a first-class citizen,
with all OImode values being representable.
Besides that headline reason, there are various side benefits. E.g.:
- All INTEGER_CSTs can be viewed either in their TYPE_PRECISION or in
"infinite" precision, which isn't possible for 128-bit constants today.
(I.e. there's no way to distinguish signed and unsigned 128-bit constants
in a double_int.)
- Wider-than-2-HWI intermediate results can be represented as a single
integer. I'm told this is useful for VRP. (wide-int is mostly Kenny
and Mike's work, I've just been butting in recently.)
- rtl-level constant folding can use the same code to handle all
combinations of CONST_INT and CONST_DOUBLE (and CONST_WIDE_INT,
on converted ports). At the moment we handle CONST_INT cases
specially, and don't try as hard with CONST_DOUBLEs.
Implementation-wise, it tries to make it so that the common single-HWI
cases are still fast.
Thanks,
Richard