This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [ARM][PATCH] Fix testsuite testcase neon-vcond-[ltgt,unordered].c
- From: Christophe Lyon <christophe dot lyon at linaro dot org>
- To: Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramrad01 at arm dot com>
- Cc: Kugan <kugan dot vivekanandarajah at linaro dot org>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Richard Earnshaw <Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com>, "patches at linaro dot org" <patches at linaro dot org>
- Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 22:48:51 +0100
- Subject: Re: [ARM][PATCH] Fix testsuite testcase neon-vcond-[ltgt,unordered].c
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <526855F7 dot 6040309 at linaro dot org> <526F8202 dot 30407 at arm dot com>
On 29 October 2013 10:38, Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramrad01@arm.com> wrote:
> On 10/24/13 00:04, Kugan wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> arm testcases neon-vcond-ltgt.c and neon-vcond-unordered.c fails in
>> Linaro 4.8 branch. It is not reproducable with trunk but it can happen.
>> Both neon-vcond-ltgt.c and neon-vcond-unordered.c scans for vbsl
>> instruction, with other vector instructions. However, as per the comment
>> for "neon_vbsl<mode>_internal" md pattern defined in neon.md, gcc can
>> generate vbsl or vbit or vbif depending on the register allocation.
>> Therfore, these testcases should scan for one of these three
>> instructions instead of just vbsl. I have updated the testcases to scan
>> vbsl or vbit or vbif now.
>>
>> Is this OK?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kugan
>
>
>
> Hit send too soon on my earlier email. Minor nit in the Changelog as below.
> Need a newline between the DATE line and the file names .
>
>
Committed on Kugan's behalf as rev 204336.
Christophe.