This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: RFA: Andes nds32 port v4 patch
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj at gmail dot com>
- Cc: gcc patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford at googlemail dot com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 16:31:45 +0000
- Subject: Re: RFA: Andes nds32 port v4 patch
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CADj25HOP_6ChfznwG9RwGQ8AmKaDysQc4j5Nd40S6z6RWmj0CA at mail dot gmail dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1310281633250 dot 30644 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <CADj25HM9=RVK3qJDtdm1a7r05Qb_F0ScQ6+oGbsxKUxuGA=qWg at mail dot gmail dot com>
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, Chung-Ju Wu wrote:
> Thank you very much for the comments on libgcc and documentation parts.
> Here I re-list the v4 patch of nds32 port:
>
> Machine Description --
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-10/msg02153.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-10/msg02154.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-10/msg02156.html
> Libgcc and Documentation --
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-10/msg02382.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-10/msg02384.html
>
> Are those nds32 port patches OK to be committed?
This is OK.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com