This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [wide-int] Make trees more like rtxes
- From: Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>
- To: Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: Richard Biener <rguenther at suse dot de>, zadeck at naturalbridge dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 12:34:14 -0700
- Subject: Re: [wide-int] Make trees more like rtxes
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <87txg9cvzc dot fsf at sandifor-thinkpad dot stglab dot manchester dot uk dot ibm dot com> <alpine dot LNX dot 2 dot 00 dot 1310231057260 dot 11149 at zhemvz dot fhfr dot qr> <87eh7cqjsf dot fsf at sandifor-thinkpad dot stglab dot manchester dot uk dot ibm dot com>
On Oct 23, 2013, at 5:00 AM, Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> offset_int, max_int, wi::to_offset and wi::to_max sound OK to me.
> Kenny? Mike?
Those two names seem reasonable. to_offset should document that these are for address offsets (and address constants) exclusively.