This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 23.09.2013 19:02, Jason Merrill wrote:
Agreed. We can arrange for the parm trees to be as if the user had explicitly specified the template and then subsequent logic will proceed 'naturally'. I'll look into it.On 09/23/2013 02:08 AM, Adam Butcher wrote:Note that this doesn't mean that 'auto' parameters in a function ptrwill be treated the same; I think we need a special case for this in the implicit template parameter introduction code (or refactor to generatetemplate parm types on the fly).It is seeming like generating the types on the fly will make various things simpler; otherwise we need to deal with rewriting arbitrarily complex types later on.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |