This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix segfault with inlining


> Yeah, I thought testing for a PARM_DECL should be sufficient?  For
> nested functions references to outer parms should have been lowered via the
> static chain at the point tree-inline.c sees them.

OK for the latter point, but are you sure for the former?  My understanding is 
that we're already in SSA form, so parameters can be represented by SSA_NAMEs 
without defining statements.

-- 
Eric Botcazou


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]