This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH, committed] Support using 'auto' in a function parameter list to introduce an implicit template parameter.


On 13.09.2013 13:26, Andreas Schwab wrote:
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/auto3.C -std=c++11  (test for errors, line 24)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/auto3.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
<built-in>: error: use of 'auto' in parameter declaration only available with -std=c++1y or -std=gnu++1y

I'm on it. Specifically, I am looking into the following on the assumption that it is my commits that stuffed them:

FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/auto3.C -std=c++11  (test for errors, line 24)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/auto3.C -std=c++11  (test for errors, line 24)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/auto3.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/auto3.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/auto9.C  (test for errors, line 115)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/auto9.C  (test for errors, line 115)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/auto9.C  (test for errors, line 120)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/auto9.C  (test for errors, line 120)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/auto9.C  (test for errors, line 121)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/auto9.C  (test for errors, line 121)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/auto9.C  (test for errors, line 82)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/auto9.C  (test for errors, line 82)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/auto9.C  (test for errors, line 83)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/auto9.C  (test for errors, line 83)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/auto9.C  (test for errors, line 84)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/auto9.C  (test for errors, line 84)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/auto9.C  (test for errors, line 85)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/auto9.C  (test for errors, line 85)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/auto9.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/auto9.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-conv4.C (internal compiler error)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-conv4.C (internal compiler error)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-conv4.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-conv4.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-eh2.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-eh2.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-nested4.C (internal compiler error)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-nested4.C (internal compiler error)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-nested4.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-nested4.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-template11.C -std=c++11 (internal compiler error) FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-template11.C -std=c++11 (internal compiler error) FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-template11.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-template11.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)

Apologies for not doing before-and-after test run prior to pushing.

Cheers,
Adam


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]