This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[PING^3] [PATCH 0/6] Contributing new target port: Andes 'nds32'.
- From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj at gmail dot com>
- To: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 01:13:53 +0800
- Subject: [PING^3] [PATCH 0/6] Contributing new target port: Andes 'nds32'.
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CADj25HNvkRC0zyWsa4O3DwCpqOi8zrH3Z2iy5nWvmPUHQ+6Cpg at mail dot gmail dot com>
Hi, GCC Global Maintainers,
The nds32 port initial patch is still awaiting for
global maintainer's approval before it may be committed
into trunk.
All the issues of review comment have been addressed
in the new v3 patches:
[PATCH 1/6] Andes nds32: configure settings for nds32 target.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-09/msg00516.html
[PATCH 2/6] Andes nds32: machine description of nds32 porting.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-09/msg00517.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-09/msg00518.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-09/msg00519.html
[PATCH 3/6] Andes nds32: libgcc of nds32 porting.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-09/msg00520.html
[PATCH 4/6] Andes nds32: testsuite modifications for nds32 target.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-09/msg00521.html
[PATCH 5/6] Andes nds32: documentation for nds32 target.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-09/msg00522.html
[PATCH 6/6] Andes nds32: wwwdoc for nds32 target.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-09/msg00524.html
If there is no further comment, may I commit these nds32 patches into trunk?
So that other developers are able to get nds32 port via svn/git easily.
We and Andes Technology Corporation really appreciate it. :)
Best regards,
jasonwucj
On 8/25/13 11:28 PM, Chung-Ju Wu wrote:
> 2013/8/13 Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@gmail.com>:
>> Hi, GCC Global Maintainers,
>>
>> The Andes nds32 port has been accepted by GCC SC [1]
>> and the initial patch is posted on [2] but still needs
>> global maintainer's approval.
>>
> [...]
>>
>> [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-07/msg00232.html
>> [2] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg01144.html
>>