This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix for PR c/57490

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: "Iyer, Balaji V" <balaji dot v dot iyer at intel dot com>, Rainer Orth <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "Marek Polacek (polacek at redhat dot com)" <polacek at redhat dot com>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 09:51:00 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for PR c/57490
References: <BF230D13CA30DD48930C31D4099330003A43C80E at FMSMSX101 dot amr dot corp dot intel dot com> <20130701162401 dot GY2336 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <BF230D13CA30DD48930C31D4099330003A43C87D at FMSMSX101 dot amr dot corp dot intel dot com> <20130701170926 dot GB2336 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <BF230D13CA30DD48930C31D4099330003A43C8C0 at FMSMSX101 dot amr dot corp dot intel dot com> <yddhagcvwh0 dot fsf at lokon dot CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE> <ydda9ldisvi dot fsf at lokon dot CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE> <yddtxizkrl0 dot fsf at lokon dot CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE> <BF230D13CA30DD48930C31D4099330003A458A6A at FMSMSX101 dot amr dot corp dot intel dot com> <520E6A65 dot 4010500 at redhat dot com> <BF230D13CA30DD48930C31D4099330003A459B1F at FMSMSX101 dot amr dot corp dot intel dot com> <520F022F dot 20604 at redhat dot com> <BF230D13CA30DD48930C31D4099330003A45A0C6 at FMSMSX101 dot amr dot corp dot intel dot com>

On 08/18/2013 07:42 PM, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:

On 08/16/2013 02:13 PM, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:

+  /* If it is a built-in array notation function, then the return type of
+     the function is the type of the array passed in as array notation.  */

Ah, then the comment should say "...is the element type of the array...".

Hmm, now it occurs to me to wonder why the CALL_EXPR doesn't alreadyhave the appropriate type?


Jason

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [PATCH] Fix for PR c/57490
  - From: Iyer, Balaji V

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Fix for PR c/57490
  - From: Rainer Orth
- RE: [PATCH] Fix for PR c/57490
  - From: Iyer, Balaji V
- Re: [PATCH] Fix for PR c/57490
  - From: Jason Merrill
- RE: [PATCH] Fix for PR c/57490
  - From: Iyer, Balaji V
- Re: [PATCH] Fix for PR c/57490
  - From: Jason Merrill
- RE: [PATCH] Fix for PR c/57490
  - From: Iyer, Balaji V

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]