This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Bare bones of virtual call tracking

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, mjambor at suse dot cz
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 13:18:44 -0400
Subject: Re: [RFC] Bare bones of virtual call tracking
References: <20130812121624 dot GF22678 at kam dot mff dot cuni dot cz> <5208FF6C dot 3060408 at redhat dot com> <20130813225117 dot GE30983 at kam dot mff dot cuni dot cz> <20130814061440 dot GB21037 at kam dot mff dot cuni dot cz>

On 08/14/2013 02:14 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:

As a temporary hack I suppose I can rely on assembler name of virtual table
to be unique for each templated class?

Actually, that seems like a fine solution for devirtualization; justcompare the mangled name of the vtable to establish type identity.


Jason

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] Bare bones of virtual call tracking
  - From: Jan Hubicka

References:
- [RFC] Bare bones of virtual call tracking
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: [RFC] Bare bones of virtual call tracking
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [RFC] Bare bones of virtual call tracking
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: [RFC] Bare bones of virtual call tracking
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]