This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DATA_ABI_ALIGNMENT (PR target/56564)
- From: Bernd Schmidt <bernds at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Richard Biener <rguenther at suse dot de>, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <hp at axis dot com>, <hp at bitrange dot com>, <uweigand at de dot ibm dot com>, <Andreas dot Krebbel at de dot ibm dot com>, <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 13:03:14 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DATA_ABI_ALIGNMENT (PR target/56564)
- References: <20130607192540 dot GH1493 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <51B245EF dot 3080602 at redhat dot com> <51B5AF99 dot 9000702 at codesourcery dot com> <20130610105535 dot GR1493 at tucnak dot redhat dot com>
On 06/10/2013 12:55 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:51:05PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>> On 06/07/2013 10:43 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>> But these I think require a good hard look to see if they really intended an
>>> ABI alignment:
>>>
>>> c6x comment explicitly mentions abi
>>
>> The ABI specifies a minimum alignment for arrays.
>
> Thus after the patch c6x.h (DATA_ALIGNMENT) should be renamed to
> DATA_ABI_ALIGNMENT, right?
I think so.
Bernd