This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [C++ Patch] PR 51908

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 13:16:18 -0400
Subject: Re: [C++ Patch] PR 51908
References: <51AE8778 dot 8080901 at oracle dot com> <51AF34DB dot 6080200 at redhat dot com> <51AF381E dot 7030709 at oracle dot com> <51AF3AE7 dot 50703 at redhat dot com> <51AF48E0 dot 5060600 at redhat dot com> <51AF5D07 dot 40408 at oracle dot com>

On 06/05/2013 11:45 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:

Now, something else I noticed a few days ago is that for C-style casts
things work fine in any case: the difference being that in that case we
set parser->in_type_id_in_expr_p to true, something we don't do for
static_cast (and the other C++ casts) in cp_parser_postfix_expression.
If I do that, then all the testcases we are considering pass with no
regressions in the testsuite. Is it something we could do? Patch draft
attached.


OK.

Jason

References:
- [C++ Patch] PR 51908
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 51908
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 51908
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 51908
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 51908
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 51908
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]