This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH, rs6000] power8 patches, patch #4 (revised), new power8 builtins
- From: Segher Boessenkool <segher at kernel dot crashing dot org>
- To: David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Michael Meissner <meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Pat Haugen <pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com>, Peter Bergner <bergner at vnet dot ibm dot com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 17:50:21 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH, rs6000] power8 patches, patch #4 (revised), new power8 builtins
- References: <20130520204053 dot GA21090 at ibm-tiger dot the-meissners dot org> <20130521234717 dot GA27879 at ibm-tiger dot the-meissners dot org> <20130604184853 dot GA12768 at ibm-tiger dot the-meissners dot org> <CAGWvnyni0U+749Y-_aS1mB9vMQ1pKHhiikGhxJmV26KVP2Rbtw at mail dot gmail dot com>
* config/rs6000/rs6000.md (eqv<mode>3): Add support for powerp eqv
instruction.
[Typo, "powerp". There are many more typos and non-grammatical
sentences.]
Why isn't this covered by boolean_operator and %q output operand?
The existing patterns (boolc<mode>3_...) do for eqv:
(set reg (xor (not reg) reg))
which is not canonical RTL.
Segher