This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Patch][gcc-4_7-branch] Backport trunk revision 187838 into gcc-4_7-branch
- From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj at gmail dot com>
- To: Richard Biener <rguenther at suse dot de>, Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
- Cc: gcc patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>, hainque at adacore dot com
- Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 15:26:59 +0800
- Subject: Re: [Patch][gcc-4_7-branch] Backport trunk revision 187838 into gcc-4_7-branch
- References: <CADj25HP5NjZ5bHmmwx3aVRUNcHe+L9Q9r-Dch+mdnxVUQpko1Q at mail dot gmail dot com> <CADj25HMwOaQmnfOuqhvufHhf0FBbz+h=TxxEaB7zxH3o3WVQvg at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAKOQZ8wCZEJrV0YoDfHxMeZMUrLUk01jo+=XvC5nkvvNcYQAeQ at mail dot gmail dot com>
2013/5/19 Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>:
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Ping: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-05/msg00429.html
>>
>> The patch is to fix dependency issue of libgcc Makefile.in
>> by adding 'rm libgcc_tm.stamp' in the clean rule.
>>
>> That was fixed on main trunk (r187838) but not on gcc-4_7-branch.
>> Since gcc-4_7-branch is still open, is it OK to backport r187838
>> into gcc-4_7-branch?
>
> It's OK with me but in general I think the release managers need to
> approve backports.
>
> Ian
Thanks Ian's approval for the libgcc part.
Hi, Richard, here is the mail for my patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-05/msg00429.html
The patch doesn't add any new feature to gcc-4_7-branch.
It just fixes the dependency issue in libgcc Makefile.in.
Is it OK to do backport?
Best regards,
jasonwucj