This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: More vector folding
- From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj at gmail dot com>
- To: Marc Glisse <marc dot glisse at inria dot fr>
- Cc: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter dot nilsson at axis dot com>, richard dot guenther at gmail dot com, gcc patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 21:54:14 +0800
- Subject: Re: More vector folding
- References: <201305171116 dot r4HBGSCY016953 at ignucius dot se dot axis dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 02 dot 1305171400460 dot 3923 at laptop-mg dot saclay dot inria dot fr>
2013/5/17 Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@inria.fr>:
>
> Yes, LOGICAL_OP_NON_SHORT_CIRCUIT seems to be it.
>
> What is the proper thing to do here? If I add the generic xfail back, we'll
> get xpass on some platforms, now we have fails on some platforms, and
> listing the platforms where we want the transformation to happen is just a
> pain. Shall I remove the testcase?
>
If we cannot redesign the testcase, we should remove it.
Because it seems the testcase cannot properly demonstrate
its purpose after r198983.
Otherwise we better have some comment in the testcase
to inform target maintainers listing their targets in the xfail field.
Best regards,
jasonwucj