This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] New switch optimization pass (PR tree-optimization/54742)
- From: Steven Bosscher <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- To: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>, Steve Ellcey <sellcey at imgtec dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, dnovillo at google dot com, amacleod at redhat dot com, Zdenek Dvorak <ook at ucw dot cz>
- Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 10:56:51 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] New switch optimization pass (PR tree-optimization/54742)
- References: <1368476190 dot 22602 dot 109 dot camel at ubuntu-sellcey> <51914D02 dot 30908 at redhat dot com> <CAFiYyc3W1sLOPQPy0XX_QfoLTZc6nioxCh8ikLtdfs26x-BG1A at mail dot gmail dot com> <1368566063 dot 16206 dot 9 dot camel at ubuntu-sellcey> <519316D8 dot 70204 at redhat dot com> <CAFiYyc09pt6B7bPxjmjqpp4wTM=f1FDSTGtU+HtZiwpRBZC5pw at mail dot gmail dot com>
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> Indeed. I'd rather have a flag to the SESE copier that tells it the region
> is SEME and in that case make it not update dominators but leave that
> to the caller (which means, recompute them).
And rename the copier to SEME copier instead of SESE ;-)
Ciao!
Steven