This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch, mips] Fix for PR target/56942
- From: Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>
- To: Steven Bosscher <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Steve Ellcey <sellcey at imgtec dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, andrew dot bennett at imgtec dot com
- Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 15:05:16 +0100
- Subject: Re: [patch, mips] Fix for PR target/56942
- References: <2c243f55-9b58-4e4a-86cf-9dd5be8ea183 at BAMAIL02 dot ba dot imgtec dot org> <87sj2gifze dot fsf at talisman dot default> <1367016105 dot 1650 dot 43 dot camel at ubuntu-sellcey> <87ehdwiezi dot fsf at talisman dot default> <1367266413 dot 8625 dot 3 dot camel at ubuntu-sellcey> <87mwsgh5eb dot fsf at talisman dot default> <CABu31nPa0i7MMzqf4tJ2Vh25nEQUkHoboXKk32y04OrPN2hL4w at mail dot gmail dot com> <87bo8w6tby dot fsf at sandifor-thinkpad dot stglab dot manchester dot uk dot ibm dot com>
Richard Sandiford <email@example.com> writes:
> Steven Bosscher <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> I dont like this at all. At the very least, if we go this way,
>> then all places where next_active_insn is used should be updated.
>> Otherwise this is just confusion proliferation.
> You mean all places where next_active_insn is used to get the jump table?
> That would be fine with me, but as author of the original change,
> I'm going to ask you to do that if you feel strongly about it :-)
> Otherwise Steve's patch seems fine to me.
>> Before my patch most
>> ports used the "active" variants and I specifically did non fix the
>> "real" variants. It is marked fixme for a reason: The JUMP_TABLE_DATA
>> should always follow immediately after the label. Copying the fixme is
>> a step in the wrong direction. Please do not commit this patch!
> But you didn't respond to my main point. It always used to be the
> case that all "active" insns were also "real". I.e. "real" was a
> _more_ restrictive condition than "active".
Gah, I really wish proof reads before hitting "send" were as effective
as those after. Obviously that should read: "active" was a _more_
restrictive condition than "real".