This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Add explicit default constructors where required by the standard

From: Evgeniy Stepanov <eugenis at google dot com>
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "libstdc++" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 19:19:57 +0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add explicit default constructors where required by the standard
References: <CAFKCwrgRP2K0eqPmbWTyBvOqieCW9ayT1CPh3yXNm9rVnNUw9Q at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAH6eHdTSg8ipaq6pCwvSVwfee1LAmVAAH=k2+UvFefFhXXQmCA at mail dot gmail dot com>

Good point, thanks!
Revised patch attached.

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 19 April 2013 15:42, Evgeniy Stepanov wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> according to n3242 8.5.6,
>>
>> If a program calls for the default initialization of an object of a
>> const-qualiïed type T, T shall be a class type with a user-provided
>> default constructor.
>>
>> This patches fixes 3 places in libstdc++ code where this requirement
>> is violated.
>
> The violation is how the objects are initialized, not how the class is defined.
>
> I would prefer to just add {} to the initializers not add the constructors.

Attachment: libstdc++-explicit-default-ctor.patch
Description: Binary data

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Add explicit default constructors where required by the standard
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

References:
- [PATCH] Add explicit default constructors where required by the standard
  - From: Evgeniy Stepanov
- Re: [PATCH] Add explicit default constructors where required by the standard
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]