This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [wwwdocs] Buildstat update for 4.8


On 04/15/2013 01:36 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Tom G. Christensen wrote:
First round of results for gcc 4.8.x.

There's something in that patch that you probably did not mean
to include:

   Missing: 4.8.0#x86_64-winnix-linux-gnu (arch/tune amdfam10/amdfam10)#http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-03/msg03331.html
   Missing: 4.8.0#x86_64-winnix-linux-gnu (arch/tune amdfam10/bdver2)#http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-03/msg03334.html
   Missing: 4.8.0#x86_64-winnix-linux-gnu (arch/tune bdver2/bdver2)#http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-03/msg03332.html
   Missing: 4.8.0#x86_64-winnix-linux-gnu (arch/tune none/none)#http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-03/msg03333.html

Indeed.
It seems I accidentally took the output from my check script instead of only cvs diff.

Are you planning to
look into those results above?

I already did when I prepared the patch. I chose to ignore them hence why they are marked as missing.

Those results were posted as data points for this mail:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-04/msg00003.html

The non-standard host triplet used served no other purpose than easy identification for the readers of that mail.

I suppose I could add them but should I then add them to the canonical x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu entry?

-tgc


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]