This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

[patch] trivial replacements for SET_INSN_DELETED and BLOCK_FOR_INSN as lhs

From: Steven Bosscher <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>
To: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 00:06:01 +0200
Subject: [patch] trivial replacements for SET_INSN_DELETED and BLOCK_FOR_INSN as lhs

Hello,

The SET_INSN_DELETED vs. set_insn_deleted thing is just an incomplete cleanup.

Using set_block_for_insn instead of using BLOCK_FOR_INSN is the "proper" way.

So, mechanical replacements. If no-one objects and the usual
bootstrap+testing passes, I'll commit this later this week as obvious.

Ciao!
Steven

Attachment: SET_to_set.diff.txt
Description: Text document

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] trivial replacements for SET_INSN_DELETED and BLOCK_FOR_INSN as lhs
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]