This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [testsuite] Don't XFAIL gfortran.dg/do_1.f90 (PR fortran/54932)

Tobias Burnus <> writes:

> Rainer Orth wrote:
>> As discussed in PR fortran/54932, the gfortran.dg/do_1.f90 execution
>> tests recently stated to XPASS at all optimization levels, adding lots
>> of testsuite noise.  The following patch removes the xfail, allowing all
>> tests to pass.
>> Tested with the appropriate runtest invocations on
>> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, i386-pc-solaris2.11, and
>> sparc-sun-solaris2.11.  Ok for mainline and 4.8 branch?
> Removing the xfail is okay. However, I wonder whether it would be better to
> leave a reference to the PR in case the failure pops up again. As the code
> is ill-defined, the failures might pop up in the future and the reference
> can help with analysis.

I prefer to leave the PR reference removed.  If the failure crops up
again, it's a simple matter of looking at the ChangeLog, svn annotate,
or bugzilla to discover the bug, if not, we keep the obsolete comment

> OK - as is or with an updated reference to the PR. – For the branch, it is
> the RMs' call when it can be committed.

Jakub, Richard?

> Please wait with the committal until GCC's web mail archive works again for
> gcc-cvs.



>> 2013-03-19  Rainer Orth  <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
>> 	PR fortran/54932
>> 	* gfortran.dg/do_1.f90: Don't xfail.

Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]