This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: GCC 4.9.0 Status Report (2012-03-16), Stage 1 starts now


On 2013.03.16 at 14:51 +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Quality Data
> > ============
> >
> > Priority          #   Change from Last Report
> > --------        ---   -----------------------
> > P1                1   +  1
> > P2               68   +  3
> > P3               11   -  7
> > --------        ---   -----------------------
> > Total            80   -  3
> 
> How did you compile these numbers? The "Serious regressions" link on
> gcc.gnu.org results in a bug list with no P1 bugs and only 74 P2+P3
> bugs.

Works for me:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=4.9&target_milestone=4.6.4&target_milestone=4.7.3&target_milestone=4.8.0&target_milestone=4.9.0&known_to_fail_type=allwordssubstr&known_to_work_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&gcchost_type=allwordssubstr&gcchost=&gcctarget_type=allwordssubstr&gcctarget=&gccbuild_type=allwordssubstr&gccbuild=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=SUSPENDED&bug_status=WAITING&bug_status=REOPENED&priority=P1&priority=P2&priority=P3&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=

80 bugs found.
IDâ 	Sev 	Priâ 	Assigneeâ 	Statusâ 	Resolution 	Summary
54114 	nor 	P1 	unassigned 	NEW 	--- 	[4.8/4.9 Regression] variable-tracking performance regression from 4.8-20120610 to 4.8-20120701
49234 	min 	P2 	aldyh 	NEW 	--- 	[4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] -Wstrict-overflow gives obviously unwarranted warning 
...

-- 
Markus


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]