This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Committed: Fix PR target/54640

From: Joern Rennecke <joern dot rennecke at embecosm dot com>
To: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:58:28 -0500
Subject: Re: Committed: Fix PR target/54640
References: <20130226102918.9uzanx3qgocowogo-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net> <512CD57F.4010009@arm.com>

Quoting Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>:

I'm not convinced this is obvious. It's certainly ugly.

It's a common idiom.

I think the correct thing to do is to force all ARM targets to use a
64-bit HOST_WIDE_INT.


Of course, if you want to set need_64bit_hwint=yes for arm in config.gcc,
and/or change the documentation that arm targets are not supported on
certain hosts, that changes things, so I have backed out my change and
leave you to do whatever you like with your port.

References:
- Committed: Fix PR target/54640
  - From: Joern Rennecke
- Re: Committed: Fix PR target/54640
  - From: Richard Earnshaw

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]