Re: PR target/55565: update failing powerpc test

[Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>]

On 01/10/13 12:58, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
> Hi,
>
> AFAIU the regexps, they are not doing what they are supposed to do
> on powerpc-apple-darwin9: the assembly reads
>
> 	fmr f1,f0
>
> i.e., fmr \[0-9\]+ or fmr 1 are never found.
>
> If I use "fmr f?\[0-9\]+,f?\[0-9\]+", then the test fails,
> in line with the other powerpc.
> If I use "lfd \(f?\[0-9\]+\),\[^\n\r\]*\[\n\r\]+\[ \t]*fmr f?1,\\1\[\n\r\]+\[ \t]*blr"
> the test passes.

I didn't tackle the Darwin issue since the original test was ignored on 
Darwin, but I guess it doesn't hurt to handle the Darwin "f" register 
variants.

OK for trunk?

Attachment: curr
Description: Text document