This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[PATCH] Yet another non-prototype builtin issue (PR middle-end/55890)


Richard,

I've build r195008 for target mips64-linux-gnu with low optimization level
({CFLAGS,CXXFLAGS,BOOT_CFLAGS}='-g -O0'), and noticed failures for
gcc.dg/torture/pr55890-{1,2,3}.c at -O0 and -O1 (which are not there without the
low optimization level).

The -O1 pr55890-1.c failure looks like this:
...
$ mips64-linux-gnu-gcc gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr55890-1.c
-fno-diagnostics-show-caret   -O1   -S  -o pr55890-1.s
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr55890-1.c: In function 'main':
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr55890-1.c:6:11: internal compiler error:
Segmentation fault
0x86dad80 crash_signal
        gcc/toplev.c:334
0x82bec14 expand_call(tree_node*, rtx_def*, int)
        gcc/calls.c:3139
0x82adae3 expand_builtin(tree_node*, rtx_def*, rtx_def*, machine_mode, int)
        gcc-mainline/gcc/builtins.c:6866
0x83d5484 expand_expr_real_1(tree_node*, rtx_def*, machine_mode,
expand_modifier, rtx_def**)
        gcc-mainline/gcc/expr.c:10141
0x82d7721 expand_call_stmt
        gcc-mainline/gcc/cfgexpand.c:2115
0x82d77eb expand_gimple_stmt_1
        gcc/cfgexpand.c:2153
0x82d7e51 expand_gimple_stmt
        gcc/cfgexpand.c:2305
0x82d8f76 expand_gimple_basic_block
        gcc/cfgexpand.c:4084
0x82d9d53 gimple_expand_cfg
        gcc/cfgexpand.c:4603
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
...

The segv occurs when evaluating GET_MODE (args[arg_nr].reg) here:
...
      if (pass == 1 && (return_flags & ERF_RETURNS_ARG))
        {
          int arg_nr = return_flags & ERF_RETURN_ARG_MASK;
          if (PUSH_ARGS_REVERSED)
            arg_nr = num_actuals - arg_nr - 1;
          if (args[arg_nr].reg
              && valreg
              && REG_P (valreg)
              && GET_MODE (args[arg_nr].reg) == GET_MODE (valreg))
          call_fusage
            = gen_rtx_EXPR_LIST (TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (args[arg_nr].tree_value)),
                                 gen_rtx_SET (VOIDmode, valreg, args[arg_nr].reg),
                                 call_fusage);
        }
...

The expression (return_flags & ERF_RETURNS_ARG) is true because we're
calculating return_flags using fndecl == memmove, and for memmove we're indeed
returning the first arg.

So arg_nr evaluates to 0, and we're accessing args[arg_nr].reg. But num_actuals
is 0, so args is the result of alloca (0) and args[arg_nr] contains some random
value, which causes the segv when evaluating GET_MODE (args[arg_nr].reg) (unless
args[arg_nr].reg happens to be NULL, in which case we don't get there).

Attached patch fixes this by testing whether arg_nr is in range before using it.
Using the patch and a cc1 recompile, I'm able to run pr55890-{1,2,3}.c successfully.

OK for trunk after I've tested this on mips64?

Thanks,
- Tom

2013-01-09  Tom de Vries  <tom@codesourcery.com>

	PR middle-end/55890
	* calls.c (expand_call): Check if arg_nr is valid.
Index: gcc/calls.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/calls.c (revision 195008)
+++ gcc/calls.c (working copy)
@@ -3136,7 +3136,9 @@ expand_call (tree exp, rtx target, int i
 	  int arg_nr = return_flags & ERF_RETURN_ARG_MASK;
 	  if (PUSH_ARGS_REVERSED)
 	    arg_nr = num_actuals - arg_nr - 1;
-	  if (args[arg_nr].reg
+	  if (arg_nr >= 0
+	      && arg_nr < num_actuals
+	      && args[arg_nr].reg
 	      && valreg
 	      && REG_P (valreg)
 	      && GET_MODE (args[arg_nr].reg) == GET_MODE (valreg))

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]