This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR fortran/42769 typebound call resolved incorrectly.

From: Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at netcologne dot de>
To: Janus Weil <janus at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Cc: Mikael Morin <mikael dot morin at sfr dot fr>, gfortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 13:06:04 +0100
Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR fortran/42769 typebound call resolved incorrectly.
References: <50E88B8C.3000605@sfr.fr> <CAKwh3qi4OU_kjvH0PQL6BE9r-gd+uhz=JT1EEcDdESP6dpCifA@mail.gmail.com>

Am 06.01.2013 12:45, schrieb Janus Weil:

Since it's not a regression, it does not necessarily need to be
backported. However, the sort of wrong-code behavior seen in comment
#24 is severe enough that it might justify backporting. I leave that
up to you.

FWITW, I think it should be backported to 4.7 at least.

Thomas

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Patch, fortran] PR fortran/42769 typebound call resolved incorrectly.
  - From: Mikael Morin

References:
- [Patch, fortran] PR fortran/42769 typebound call resolved incorrectly.
  - From: Mikael Morin
- Re: [Patch, fortran] PR fortran/42769 typebound call resolved incorrectly.
  - From: Janus Weil

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]