This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH][Cilkplus] Fix pragma simd info being lost
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 05:01:48PM +0000, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
> > Why do you think fatal_error is the right thing here? Why doesn't normal error
> > work? Generally, if one function contains 10 #pragma simd loops that require
> > vectorization and 5 out of them aren't vectorized, it is nicer for users to be told
> > about all 5 of them, rather than just the first one.
> > fatal_error will exit immediately.
>
> The #pragma simd assert requires the compiler to halt compilation if the
> loop is not vectorized. This is why I used fatal_error. The default case
> is noassert.
The compilation is halted even with error, compiler will exit with non-zero
exit status, won't compile any further functions, etc.
Jakub