This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][Cilkplus] Fix pragma simd info being lost


On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 05:01:48PM +0000, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
> > Why do you think fatal_error is the right thing here?  Why doesn't normal error
> > work?  Generally, if one function contains 10 #pragma simd loops that require
> > vectorization and 5 out of them aren't vectorized, it is nicer for users to be told
> > about all 5 of them, rather than just the first one.
> > fatal_error will exit immediately.
> 
> The #pragma simd assert requires the compiler to halt compilation if the
> loop is not vectorized.  This is why I used fatal_error.  The default case
> is noassert.

The compilation is halted even with error, compiler will exit with non-zero
exit status, won't compile any further functions, etc.

	Jakub


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]