This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH i386]: Enable push/pop in pro/epilogue for modern CPUs

From: Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>
To: Xinliang David Li <davidxl at google dot com>
Cc: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:07:11 -0800
Subject: Re: [PATCH i386]: Enable push/pop in pro/epilogue for modern CPUs
References: <CAFULd4Z4hGXfjF-VXdazsnSQpnBszLxQidaVVOsZddZx0ep69w@mail.gmail.com> <CAFiYyc150rLk2yuiMVQAiUN+4sYJ_UsAW9L2UwVhEV1hi_6GQA@mail.gmail.com> <CAAkRFZK5pguC2j3j3Pi5gLEhkLzG8sj+5RSW3j9xkk91+a7ezA@mail.gmail.com>

On Dec 10, 2012, at 12:42 PM, Xinliang David Li <davidxl@google.com> wrote:
> I have not measured the CFI size impact -- but conceivably it should
> be larger -- which is unfortunate.

Code speed and size are preferable to optimizing dwarf size…  :-)  I'd let dwarf 5 fix it!

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH i386]: Enable push/pop in pro/epilogue for modern CPUs
  - From: Richard Biener

References:
- Re: [PATCH i386]: Enable push/pop in pro/epilogue for modern CPUs
  - From: Uros Bizjak
- Re: [PATCH i386]: Enable push/pop in pro/epilogue for modern CPUs
  - From: Richard Biener
- Re: [PATCH i386]: Enable push/pop in pro/epilogue for modern CPUs
  - From: Xinliang David Li

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]