This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tsan] Instrument atomics
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 09:23:30AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:13:42PM +0400, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > I've added 128-bit atomic ops:
> > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=rev&revision=168683
>
> Thanks.
+#if (defined(__clang__) && defined(__clang_major__) \
+ && defined(__clang_minor__) && __clang__ >= 1 && __clang_major__ >= 3 \
+ && __clang_minor__ >= 3) \
+ || (defined(__GNUC__) && defined(__GNUC_MINOR__) \
+ && defined(__GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__) && __GNUC__ >= 4 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 6 \
+ && __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__ >= 3)
is wrong, one thing is that __int128 is available only on a couple of
architectures (i?86/x86_64/ia64 or so), and more importantly, the above
isn't true for say GCC 4.7.0, because __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__ is then < 3.
So, either you want something like
#define GCC_VERSION ((__GNUC__) * 10000 + (__GNUC_MINOR__) * 100 + (__GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__))
and then you can test like #if GCC_VERSION >= 40603
or, for the int128 case, much better just to test
defined(__GNUC__) && defined(__SIZEOF_INT128__)
(no idea if clang doesn't define the same macro, if it does, you could
just test for presence of the sizeof macro).
Jakub