This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [6/8] Add strict volatile handling to bit_field_mode_iterator


> This patch makes bit_field_mode_iterator take -fstrict-volatile-bitfields
> into account, in cases where the size of the underlying object is known.
> This is used in the next patch.

Do we really need to add that to the iterator?  The -fstrict-volatile-
bitfields implementation is still controversial so I'm not sure that we want
let it spread.  Can't the client code just skip the problematic modes?

-- 
Eric Botcazou


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]