This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix combined tree for LTO

From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
To: Andrew Pinski <andrew dot pinski at caviumnetworks dot com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 15:46:24 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix combined tree for LTO
References: <CA+=Sn1mES-hbm4x-iZHdJjCX0NAeEeNT+TX8TDQsctx3u=snEA@mail.gmail.com>

Il 10/11/2012 05:30, Andrew Pinski ha scritto:
> Hi,
>   The problem here is that set PLUGIN_LD_SUFFIX to ld-new which is not
> the final installed binary name.  This patch fixes the problem by
> changing if we got ld-new to just ld.
> Note this issue has been around since 4.6 but not many people test
> installed binary and it does not show up while doing testing from the
> combined tree either.
> 
> OK?  Bootstrapped and tested with and without being in a combined tree
> without any regressions.

OK with one change: please make it test collect-ld as well.

Paolo

> Thanks,
> Andrew Pinski
> 
> * configure.ac: Set PLUGIN_LD_SUFFIX to just "ld" if it was "ld-new".
> * configure: Regenerate.
>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Fix combined tree for LTO
  - From: Andrew Pinski

References:
- [PATCH] Fix combined tree for LTO
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]