This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [asan] change libasan to libsanitizer
- From: Xinliang David Li <davidxl at google dot com>
- To: Dodji Seketeli <dodji at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Wei Mi <wmi at google dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 14:52:52 -0700
- Subject: Re: [asan] change libasan to libsanitizer
- References: <CA+4CFy5F_Nwv5OL6uTaOsrqO5=sLBDVRJtHALM=Lb2ar3-FdkQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+4CFy5xFy8rmEtXzh6cJ===wB7NaqDCK5Fdci=wZpSBFreqRQ@mail.gmail.com> <87y5il6lng.fsf@redhat.com>
I think it is better to apply this patch to asan first to avoid extra
thread. You probably just need to retrieve your runtime part of the
trunk patch and resend it. Make sense?
thanks,
David
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Dodji Seketeli <dodji@redhat.com> wrote:
> Instead of planning this change for the branch, would it be possible to
> plan it for trunk directly, on top of the patches that I posted for
> review there?
>
> The patch could go in on top of the patches I posted.
>
> Wei Mi <wmi@google.com> writes:
>
>> This is the part2.
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Wei Mi <wmi@google.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Here is the patch to change libasan to libsanitizer and reorganize the
>>> directory. I divided the patch into three parts for review.
>>>
>>> patch.part1.txt: Contains the changes in the outermost level.
>>> patch.part2.txt.bz2: Remove libasan
>>> patch.part3.txt.bz2: Add libsanitizer
>>>
>>> Is it ok for asan branch?
>>>
>>> 2012-11-1 Wei Mi <wmi@google.com>
>>>
>>> * configure.ac: Change target-libasan to target-libsanitizer.
>>> * configure.in: Regenerate.
>>> * Makefile.def: Change libasan module to libsanitizer.
>>> * Makefile.in: Regenerate.
>>> * libsanitizer: Change libasan to libsanitizer and add
>>> an empty tsan directory under libsanitizer.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Wei.
>>
>
> --
> Dodji