This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: ping [patch, fortran] Handle -Wextra, -fcompare-reals is implied with -Wextra

From: Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at netcologne dot de>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k dot org>
Cc: Janus Weil <janus at gcc dot gnu dot org>, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:10:16 +0200
Subject: Re: *ping* [patch, fortran] Handle -Wextra, -fcompare-reals is implied with -Wextra
References: <505F69DF.5090706@netcologne.de> <5065D3F1.2040607@netcologne.de> <5082F792.9050004@netcologne.de> <CAKwh3qhq0tHHWqz+re0gZKYqtEo2Q4ZajxOg=H+GYohV_vfXAA@mail.gmail.com> <5083D099.8080708@netcologne.de> <m2objo4x8s.fsf@igel.home>

Am 27.10.2012 01:41, schrieb Andreas Schwab:

Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> writes:

Index: trans.c
===================================================================
--- trans.c	(revision 192638)
+++ trans.c	(working copy)
@@ -814,26 +814,23 @@ gfc_allocate_allocatable (stmtblock_t * block, tre

What's this?

Something that I accidentally committed, which is part of a patch pending review (see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-10/msg00613.html).

Reverted as of revision 192875.

Thomas

References:
- Re: *ping* [patch, fortran] Handle -Wextra, -fcompare-reals is implied with -Wextra
  - From: Thomas Koenig
- Re: *ping* [patch, fortran] Handle -Wextra, -fcompare-reals is implied with -Wextra
  - From: Andreas Schwab

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: *ping* [patch, fortran] Handle -Wextra, -fcompare-reals is implied with -Wextra

Re: ping [patch, fortran] Handle -Wextra, -fcompare-reals is implied with -Wextra