This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi, I've updated the patch: 1. abandon the changes in cfgexpand.c 2. set the block for trees when lowering gimple stmt. 3. add a unittest. However, this patch will trigger two lto bug when asserting LTO_NO_PREVAIL for TREE_CHAIN. After debugging for a while, I found that the problem was also there even without the patch. This patch just reveal the problem by moving a decl into cache so that it will be checked. As I'm not familiar with LTO, not quite sure what the root problem is. Can anyone help take a look? Thanks, Dehao gcc/ChangeLog: 2012-10-25 Dehao Chen <dehao@google.com> * tree-eh.c (do_return_redirection): Set location for jump statement. (do_goto_redirection): Likewise. (frob_into_branch_around): Likewise. (lower_try_finally_nofallthru): Likewise. (lower_try_finally_copy): Likewise. (lower_try_finally_switch): Likewise. * gimple-low.c (tree_set_block_r): New callback function. (lower_stmt): Set block for tested expr. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2012-10-25 Dehao Chen <dehao@google.com> * g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/block.C: New testcase.
Attachment:
patch.txt
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |