This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Move statements upwards after reassociation


On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Steven Bosscher <stevenb.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Richard Biener
> <richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
>> NB, the whole reassoc code needs a re-write to avoid the excessive
>> stmt modifications when it does nothing.  So I'd very much rather avoid
>> adding anything to reassoc until that rewrite happened.
>
> IMHO it's fair to Easwaran to hold up a patch for a hypothetical
> rewrite. Do you have a plan for this rewrite in mind? If not, and
> Easwaran's patch does something good (I haven't looked at it to tell)
> then it seems to me it should be considered for including.

Did you mean "fair" or "unfair"?

Ian


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]