This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Add option for dumping to stderr (issue6190057)
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- To: Sharad Singhai <singhai at google dot com>
- Cc: Xinliang David Li <davidxl at google dot com>, Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 04:50:52 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add option for dumping to stderr (issue6190057)
- References: <20120509064637.22949A2081@nabu.mtv.corp.google.com> <CAAiZkiCAjA9cLMdqQeMgBuftxQ+oSa0m0yxohs33=qOCVBc17w@mail.gmail.com> <CAKxPW65MhmoGHQ0u2_0tsQc=9VfXCN4+afmqBULDKM=LwZqHvg@mail.gmail.com> <CAAkRFZLRb7ShAzoUSP9eQV8qchJxu_n=DrR19n0OLfKK9f-fSw@mail.gmail.com> <CAFiYyc1eo6=XjhAGz8MWKnVDUQKjkU=Kgfu38vRZyLq3XQSxng@mail.gmail.com> <CAAkRFZ+4b81ucyNgPmTFs25wD9Zm-4jcP02W9LWjjB=hQ-TO_A@mail.gmail.com> <CAFiYyc3o8bZjaMv1gZBMQJodSCH9UsWqohZ9Jw3szN+DXFjRgw@mail.gmail.com> <CAAkRFZJ9_yH-A74=aRkX2+zKgegg+SKobqJNu4a0fA7F90hTRg@mail.gmail.com> <CAAkRFZ+YyLKdsT8LSS88rd9-nxVuGrketu+-2C5qPp-98g1_vg@mail.gmail.com> <CAFiYyc0mfhEyPpY_+qv4StNPiatYKcUKz4vxbX=SeWNPCLJEYg@mail.gmail.com> <CAAkRFZJ3BvP3ytzkZgWqSSzkt+Z26n_zMJKEyhM_1KfEi5mCzQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAAiZkiDz5V2Nysn3AA4-GRgw6_eCEM85z6-gZaMLNq9L+B2DbA@mail.gmail.com> <CAAkRFZKhpk-iMppKWSnKX0Q4SLm7-rWrr2D8cWS8iOP4ypMWzw@mail.gmail.com> <CAFiYyc3xm0xYjLAgpzo7q0ovQKJXR4STyoUC=OKLn4XRiTZw6g@mail.gmail.com> <CAKxPW65FKYwpqaB4DnWd+6aS57ZrNoY91rKiX+L-sS2KQ-VFRw@mail.gmail.com> <CAAkRFZLO4rkLnWR067-=+G94F2pnEgX3Z5jXK0mFu545x2EAzA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKxPW65ar+ZdAwYtG5ECnCNYH+Jw+hiyPbXR2_bQ1OoXsr8_Rg@mail.gmail.com> <CAFiYyc37y7Q_z_7vHdZe98s6kKpgTJi4_ehmk=6gVnirV0TFDA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKxPW66yXwtfo_dnpPSudbrTAMOphwdk=KeAR_2U0P1cvKb4Sw@mail.gmail.com> <CAFiYyc3BF-3z3_QdAZxfSe4jupNbb_Ub_nLbjJQ+MisQxGR_CQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKxPW67rYndb0AuDBpTfij8vB54Txcg4p6Yba693yTpL9=24fg@mail.gmail.com> <CAFiYyc2neYLHce0EUDCBcVKEw4iHAA0rZhEVTWy4+SaiGYPx+A@mail.gmail.com> <CAKxPW67D5EnOvTMJGcntyXG7WwQud2sW0kS3nHenijp6o0JC7g@mail.gmail.com> <CAKxPW67Nn9YSwH_xwFXBM7=y=32s_HpQ4fUAE+E8GoRSsVjxbA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKxPW66cfyabmH-ZbsMtempBCv5zV=embh=WsR18gAVgpDpFMA@mail.gmail.com> <CAAkRFZ+x+Q6E_6DL8w8JyvHZqGVCxiSc8NDRumc9EhUi1vp++Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAKxPW656sVbeVewS6dZL_d7X+02be16JRZ-4mrXkRLzwyuUxkw@mail.gmail.com> <CAFiYyc3AJ1C92QhZHTk83rZPgLSqwk+=qgYDeY9HG-p4UPRrMA@mail.gmail.com> <CAAkRFZJKbNwtA6cJ+sSn5gm1fdX8cr1yoOZz8RFwQd+5aRUQyQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAFiYyc0Q+JdNc3piYNsZvPBkK3GHWbibysn3dRe0=P_Fc6JYVw@mail.gmail.com> <CAAkRFZLQjn_QtG6F7ecyjvgjT1yZUaoihseEDzWR2fHcbJ8fkQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKxPW65+e7jdfo+OphVb2i7SoUOO2_h64oki+qgRn2a=WtFRtw@mail.gmail.com> <CAFiYyc0GgvUx1qh72hrp91CaumVd--kAx7r_fBD9HxrcuM7RMw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKxPW66wyOSLxoq31BjM230UQr9NdRpnt6n67SkE-y7D2UKMVg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKxPW66FH5BkbvzPCc8SjNXNiTmGH7pSy1CN797=1JrTcS7WyQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAFiYyc0j53_FJmtxm3bUbS89P+hdEWz9yw22Satf3C9azEeQMg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKxPW64cOJr-Emh_c-re_L+kJ_p-CrVC3yoPaUKMubbC8_gf4w@mail.gmail.com> <CAAkRFZLQg-sVLL3d8v9yGu0yY-V4T+qkR3r3iOPCNKP8v-NWWg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKxPW65ohN989RuyK+XqJDjOJ4gFVF9hB4+qfP0LfU_6q4i8yw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKxPW65vWzTB7njwf-TNA567o+kTS+nfOJDM1dtQGg=6xpX7cw@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Sharad Singhai <singhai@google.com> wrote:
> Resend to gcc-patches
>
> I have addressed the comments by fixing all the minor issues,
> bootstrapped and tested on x86_64. I did the recommended reshuffling
> by moving non-tree code from tree-dump.c into a new file dumpfile.c.
>
> I committed two successive revisions
> r191883 Main patch with the dump infrastructure changes. However, I
> accidentally left out a new file, dumpfile.c.
> r191884 Added dumpfile.c, and did the renaming of dump_* functions
> from gimple_pretty_print.[ch].
>
> As things stand right now, r191883 is broken because of the missing
> file 'dumpfile.c', which the very next commit fixes. Anyone who got
> broken revision r191883, please svn update. I am really very sorry
> about that.
>
> I have a couple more minor patches which deal with renaming; I plan to
> address those later.
>
It caused:
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-11.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-11.c scan-tree-dump-times vect
"vectorized 1 loops" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-11a.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-11a.c scan-tree-dump-times vect
"vectorized 1 loops" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-11b.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-11b.c scan-tree-dump-times vect
"vectorized 0 loops" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-11c.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-11c.c scan-tree-dump-times vect
"vectorized 0 loops" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-2.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-2.c scan-tree-dump-times vect
"vectorized 1 loops" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-25.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-25.c scan-tree-dump-times vect
"vectorized 2 loops" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-26.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-26.c scan-tree-dump-times vect
"Alignment of access forced using peeling" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-26.c scan-tree-dump-times vect
"vectorized 1 loops" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-28.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-28.c scan-tree-dump-times vect
"Alignment of access forced using peeling" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-28.c scan-tree-dump-times vect
"vectorized 1 loops" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-32.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-32.c scan-tree-dump-times vect
"vectorized 1 loops" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/O3-pr36119.f90 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/O3-pr39595.f (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/Ofast-pr50414.f90 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/cost-model-pr34445.f (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/cost-model-pr34445a.f (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/fast-math-pr38968.f90 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/fast-math-pr38968.f90 scan-tree-dump vect
"vectorized 1 loops"
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/fast-math-real8-pr40801.f90 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/fast-math-real8-pr40801.f90 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/fast-math-vect-8.f90 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/fast-math-vect-8.f90 scan-tree-dump-times vect
"vectorized 1 loops" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/no-fre-no-copy-prop-O3-pr51704.f90 (test for
excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/no-vfa-pr32377.f90 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/no-vfa-pr32377.f90 scan-tree-dump-times vect
"vectorized 2 loops" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/no-vfa-pr32457.f90 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/no-vfa-pr32457.f90 scan-tree-dump-times vect
"vectorized 0 loops" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/pr19049.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times vect
"complicated access pattern" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/pr19049.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/pr32377.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times vect
"vectorized 2 loops" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/pr32377.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/pr32380.f -O scan-tree-dump-times vect
"vectorized 6 loops" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/pr32380.f -O (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/pr33301.f -O (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/pr50178.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/pr50412.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/pr51058-2.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/pr51058.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/pr51285.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-1.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times vect
"vectorized 3 loops" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-1.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-2.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times vect
"Alignment of access forced using peeling" 3
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-2.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times vect
"Vectorizing an unaligned access" 2
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-2.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times vect
"vectorized 3 loops" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-2.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-3.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times vect
"Alignment of access forced using peeling" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-3.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times vect
"Vectorizing an unaligned access" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-3.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-4.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times vect
"Alignment of access forced using peeling" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-4.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times vect
"Vectorizing an unaligned access" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-4.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times vect
"accesses have the same alignment." 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-4.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times vect
"vectorized 1 loops" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-4.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times vect
"Alignment of access forced using peeling" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times vect
"Vectorizing an unaligned access" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times vect
"vectorized 1 loops" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-6.f -O (test for excess errors)
on Linux/x86.
--
H.J.