This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Implement Nakagami distribution as an extension.

From: Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net>
To: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at gmail dot com>, "libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:25:45 -0400
Subject: Re: Implement Nakagami distribution as an extension.
References: <50573F1A.1050000@verizon.net> <CAOPLpQejg+UKtgSf=gqDNg3qARKPOSdhtJ+7Ord3-pTwbXzCzQ@mail.gmail.com> <5057CD07.5050004@verizon.net> <505884F2.6090907@oracle.com>

On 09/18/2012 10:28 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:

On 09/18/2012 03:23 AM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
Here is another tweak for the Nakagami distribution.

operator() is a one liner without a local variable.

The template friend is fixed and the relevant test has been added. Changed dates.

If this version is tested (please remember to say where and how) it's Ok. Thanks!

Paolo.

PS: lately I normally use -std=c++11 for new testcases: IMHO at this point -std=c++0x should be considered a legacy switch.

tweaked dates in comment.
Tested x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux.
Committed.

Attachment: CL_nakagami
Description: Text document

Attachment: patch_nakagami3
Description: Text document

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]