This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 54387: [F03] Wrongly accepts non-proc result variable on the RHS of a proc-pointer assignment

From: Tobias Burnus <burnus at net-b dot de>
To: Janus Weil <janus at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Cc: gfortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 13:09:53 +0200
Subject: Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 54387: [F03] Wrongly accepts non-proc result variable on the RHS of a proc-pointer assignment
References: <CAKwh3qhNNn2Y97HjznfwbL2Z6e3t4Op9FDFwq1noYrj_NuEheQ@mail.gmail.com>

Am 15.09.2012 17:22, schrieb Janus Weil:

here is a small patch which fixes an accepts-invalid problem with
proc-pointer assignments. Regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Ok
for trunk?

OK. Thanks for the patch.

(Though, I am wondering whether the error message could be improved. We know that the RHS is not the procedure but the result variable; it might help the user if the message is a bit clearer. But you can also keep the current version.)

Tobias

2012-09-15 Janus Weil <janus@gcc.gnu.org>
	PR fortran/54387
	* expr.c (gfc_check_pointer_assign): Check for result of embracing
	function.
2012-09-15 Janus Weil <janus@gcc.gnu.org>
	PR fortran/54387
	* gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_38.f90: New.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 54387: [F03] Wrongly accepts non-proc result variable on the RHS of a proc-pointer assignment
  - From: Janus Weil

References:
- [Patch, Fortran] PR 54387: [F03] Wrongly accepts non-proc result variable on the RHS of a proc-pointer assignment
  - From: Janus Weil

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]