This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [v3] fix bootstrap/54419

From: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr (Dominique Dhumieres)
To: jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com, gerald at pfeifer dot com
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, howarth at bromo dot med dot uc dot edu, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, drepper at gmail dot com, dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 22:34:26 +0200
Subject: Re: [v3] fix bootstrap/54419
References: <CAH6eHdQ60kZimCMJKvgz+Y_DbM_sGN6ShGi=Wr_jN8v5eWqyKQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1209092128590.4718@trevally.site> <CAH6eHdQf4gdr2zrDch0vRvvreiR+u5CwCY56nHXsh9ar=vM2Ng@mail.gmail.com>

> Also, Jack, why is the variable called ac_cv_x86_rdrand rather than
> glibcxx_x86_rdrand to be consistent with every other variable in
> libstdc++-v3/acinclude.m4?  And why _GLIBCXX_X86_RDRAND not something
> like _GLIBCXX_HAVE_AS_X86_RDRAND?  The bootstrap failure is fixed, but

Although I cannot answer for Jack, let me note that this was so in the
original non-working patch at

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28127

Aren't the "c++ runtime libs" maintainers know what they are doing?

> I think we should change those names.

You are on the driver seat;-)

Dominique

References:
- [v3] fix bootstrap/54419
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: [v3] fix bootstrap/54419
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: [v3] fix bootstrap/54419
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]