This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:54 AM, Dehao Chen <dehao@google.com> wrote:On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:18 AM, Dehao Chen <dehao@google.com> wrote:ping....
Conceptually I like the change. Can a libcpp maintainer please have a 2nd look?
Dehao, did you do any compile-time and memory-usage benchmarks?
I don't have a memory benchmarks at hand. But I've tested it through some huge apps, each of which takes more than 1 hour to build on a modern machine. None of them had observed noticeable memory footprint and compile time increase.
Thanks.
I'd like to see a 2nd "ok", but hereby I give a first one ;) It's a big change but definitely a good one.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |