This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Set correct source location for deallocator calls
- From: Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org>
- To: Bryce McKinlay <bmckinlay at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>, Dehao Chen <dehao at google dot com>, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, David Li <davidxl at google dot com>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 11:58:15 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Set correct source location for deallocator calls
- References: <CAO2gOZXfnETUe4wqjT7p6fd61hXreu9PDfqKxNz+HxpE0E7K0g@mail.gmail.com> <50243480.7090803@redhat.com> <CAO2gOZURCuWUk2MVwCwmwrijNzWxJt3q=HUpU7=Qv6zB9e-uqA@mail.gmail.com> <50254A50.8070208@redhat.com> <CAO2gOZXhHuFGJ0z=jvkYKZ84EoDaPSYVjxS7QzGore56SyhWyQ@mail.gmail.com> <50255B35.9020705@redhat.com> <CAO2gOZWe+qMrVyvOoo7Ek-di0NKZxxU4Z=pqrDCqqCCAfctZOw@mail.gmail.com> <50258712.4070002@redhat.com> <CAO2gOZUQQjmKtooyXXAfgFoNVbeNwtT+P=E7pQ6jC=e07Nsr2g@mail.gmail.com> <CAO2gOZX-Gn+b6LEzps5zxhgmwQWcJ-zFqG=a7hesW6fbVyxZYQ@mail.gmail.com> <502E6774.8050609@redhat.com> <CAO2gOZWhueDAShNLbNcJpkHA6QqXk1LNZhEMFvfT77aTZTCH9w@mail.gmail.com> <503F7876.7030606@redhat.com> <503F84A9.8010504@redhat.com> <503F95D8.5010506@redhat.com> <CAO2gOZUxD9-Y3O6iS22HNEHUWaH=0Cm97FZ+KHmhkLmCzahVAA@mail.gmail.com> <CALUNu-qXtr3pSTa8j60nD4Y4QK6VNAEOaPh34RRd4qt671gzkA@mail.gmail.com> <CALUNu-p2-rvGCLYn9s1gy-rGOq+cOwZCw9S1Twbjcba0dVKTfQ@mail.gmail.com> <50463661.1020303@redhat.com> <CALUNu-oP9dqG63EHyN18gYj4P3gwrrJcp4Zgrz-pABNxabmsCg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 18:17 +0100, Bryce McKinlay wrote:
> libgcj wouldn't actually use it for unwinding, we already have all
> that. We'd just use it to read DWARF debug info and give us the source
> code line numbers.
Casey Marshell did also write that part some time ago, but it was never
finished/integrated.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2004-q3/msg00350.html
Cheers,
Mark