This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: VxWorks Patches Back from the Dead!

From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
To: Jay Foad <jay dot foad at gmail dot com>
Cc: rbmj <rbmj at verizon dot net>, Bruce Korb <bkorb at gnu dot org>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, nathan at codesourcery dot com
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 10:57:43 +0200
Subject: Re: VxWorks Patches Back from the Dead!
References: <503573B9.5090406@verizon.net> <50357EC8.3000709@gnu.org> <50359513.4090505@verizon.net> <5035E8BC.3010909@gnu.org> <CANd1uZmBxXkCig5bdw9pH6bfKwMOgbfYAyJpWE522XhQTebuOA@mail.gmail.com>

Il 23/08/2012 10:35, Jay Foad ha scritto:
>> > This can be simply
>> >
>> > #define ioctl(fd, func, arg) ioctl(fd, func, (int)arg)
> "(int)(arg)", surely.

Right, only the other parentheses are unnecessary. (Cut-and-paste mistake).

Paolo

References:
- VxWorks Patches Back from the Dead!
  - From: rbmj
- Re: VxWorks Patches Back from the Dead!
  - From: Bruce Korb
- Re: VxWorks Patches Back from the Dead!
  - From: rbmj
- Re: VxWorks Patches Back from the Dead!
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: VxWorks Patches Back from the Dead!
  - From: Jay Foad

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]