This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Merge C++ conversion into trunk (0/6 - Overview)

From: Lawrence Crowl <crowl at google dot com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Cc: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, bonzini at gnu dot org, dj at redhat dot com, rguenther at suse dot de, tromey at redhat dot com, laurynas dot biveinis at gmail dot com
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 18:31:40 -0700
Subject: Re: Merge C++ conversion into trunk (0/6 - Overview)
References: <20120812200427.GA12561@google.com> <502A574B.3000109@google.com> <502AA012.8090200@google.com> <CAMe9rOqc+5+69-3LzrGzCX0C2WcOBO6U049MoOocdu613t5aVw@mail.gmail.com>

On 8/20/12, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> The C++ merge caused:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54332
>
> GCC memory usage is more than doubled from <= 3GB to >= 10GB.
> Is this a known issue?

The two memory stat reports show no differences.  Are you sure you
didn't splice in the wrong report?

-- 
Lawrence Crowl

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Merge C++ conversion into trunk (0/6 - Overview)
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: Merge C++ conversion into trunk (0/6 - Overview)
  - From: Richard Guenther

References:
- Merge C++ conversion into trunk (0/6 - Overview)
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: Merge C++ conversion into trunk (0/6 - Overview)
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: Merge C++ conversion into trunk (0/6 - Overview)
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: Merge C++ conversion into trunk (0/6 - Overview)
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]