This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH, ARM] Don't pull in unwinder for 64-bit division routines
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
- To: ramrad01 at arm dot com
- Cc: Julian Brown <julian at codesourcery dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "ian at airs dot com" <ian at airs dot com>, Richard Earnshaw <Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com>, Ye Joey <joey dot ye dot cc at gmail dot com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 18:13:23 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH, ARM] Don't pull in unwinder for 64-bit division routines
- References: <20120720111527.16dea84e@octopus> <20120724132708.49bc2afc@octopus> <502D4274.9070002@arm.com>
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramrad01@arm.com> wrote:
> On 07/24/12 13:27, Julian Brown wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:15:27 +0100
>> Julian Brown <julian@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Anyway: this revised version of the patch removes the strange libgcc
>>> Makefile-fragment changes, the equivalent of which have since been
>>> incorporated into mainline GCC now anyway, so the patch is somewhat
>>> more straightforward than it was previously.
>>
>>
>> Joey Ye contacted me offlist and suggested that the t-divmod-ef
>> fragment might be better integrated into t-bpabi instead. Doing that
>> makes the patch somewhat smaller/cleaner.
>>
>> Minimally re-tested, looks OK.
>
>
> The original submission makes no mention of testing ? The ARM specific
> portions look OK to me modulo no regressions.
>
> Ian, can also take a quick look.
Looks fine to me.
Ian