This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: complex.h

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: Marc Glisse <marc dot glisse at inria dot fr>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, bkoz at redhat dot com, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 20:59:27 +0200
Subject: Re: complex.h
References: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1207281628130.8721@laptop-mg.saclay.inria.fr> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1208102116390.3294@laptop-mg.saclay.inria.fr> <50268DCC.2070106@oracle.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1208111859450.3290@laptop-mg.saclay.inria.fr>

Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@inria.fr> ha scritto:

>To be honest, I only checked the patch on linux/glibc, so there is a
>real
>risk on other platforms (which I don't have access to). I also did a
>quick
>sanity check on freebsd (not a true test).

Ok, conditioning the small change on glibc would not be a big deal, in case. Let's ask Rainer to double check Solaris, anyway.

Paolo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: complex.h
  - From: Rainer Orth

References:
- Re: complex.h
  - From: Marc Glisse
- Re: complex.h
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: complex.h
  - From: Marc Glisse

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]