This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH,i386] fma,fma4 and xop flags
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 2012-08-10 12:59, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> Actually, this is the problem you are trying to solve. The fma4
>> patterns are defined before fma3, so gcc prefers these.
>
> The Real Problem is that they should not be separate patterns.
> They should be a single pattern that selects alternatives via
> the enabled isa.
Yes, I am just writing the patch ;)
Do you think that enabled isa is also appropriate for 4.7?
Uros.
- References:
- [PATCH,i386] fma,fma4 and xop flags
- From: Ganesh.Gopalasubramanian
- Re: [PATCH,i386] fma,fma4 and xop flags
- RE: [PATCH,i386] fma,fma4 and xop flags
- From: Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh
- Re: [PATCH,i386] fma,fma4 and xop flags
- Re: [PATCH,i386] fma,fma4 and xop flags