Re: [rs6000 3/3] Remove MQ

[Segher Boessenkool <segher at kernel dot crashing dot org>]

> This is okay, but gpc_reg_operand in predicates.md needs something
> better than a magic "64" constant in the test.  Should this be a
> comment or a new symbolic value related the max/last FPR or number of
> general registers?

The test assumes a lot about the relative ordering of the
various regnos (like most of the predicates).  In my opinion
a literal here is better than testing with some in fact
unrelated macro.  All these predicates could use a cleanup,
bring them into the 21st century.  I didn't really feel like
doing that though.

I'll add a comment.


Segher