This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR44354 implied-do-loop array constructors using the induction variable in the bounds

From: Tobias Burnus <burnus at net-b dot de>
To: Mikael Morin <mikael dot morin at sfr dot fr>
Cc: gfortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 07:58:58 +0200
Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR44354 implied-do-loop array constructors using the induction variable in the bounds
References: <5009A06F.20905@sfr.fr> <5009B976.7080906@sfr.fr> <500A80DD.9050307@sfr.fr>

Mikael Morin wrote:

Here is another attempt.
I moved the diagnostic code from gfc_resolve_iterator to
resolve_array_list, so that it doesn't trigger for do loops.
Regression test in progress. OK?

The patch looks OK:

Though, I wonder why you only get a warning (which is fine); I thought that -std=gnu (the default) – and, in particular, in combination with -pedantic (test-suite default) – will give an error for gfc_notify_standard, not a warning.

Tobi

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Patch, fortran] PR44354 implied-do-loop array constructors using the induction variable in the bounds
  - From: Mikael Morin

References:
- [Patch, fortran] PR44354 implied-do-loop array constructors using the induction variable in the bounds
  - From: Mikael Morin
- Re: [Patch, fortran] PR44354 implied-do-loop array constructors using the induction variable in the bounds
  - From: Mikael Morin
- Re: [Patch, fortran] PR44354 implied-do-loop array constructors using the induction variable in the bounds
  - From: Mikael Morin

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]