This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [Patch, mips] Fix compiler abort with -mips32r2 -mips16 -msynci


On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 18:30 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:

> The abort sounds like the bug here.  It's deliberate that things like
> -msynci, -mbranch-likely, etc., are OK with -mips16.  On the one hand,
> you could compile with -mips16 but have an __attribute__((nomips16))
> function that could benefit from using SYNCI.  On the other, you could
> compile without -mips16 but have an __attribute__((mips16)) function
> that needs to avoid SYNCI.
> 
> -mips16 really just sets the default ISA mode for functions that don't
> specify one.  That's why override_options hides mips16ness so early on,
> like you say.
> 
> Richard

Here is a new patch.  It clears the MASK_SYNCI bit when setting the
MASK_MIPS16 bit in mips_set_mips16_mode.  I did not add any warnings
because I didn't think we wanted a warning every time we compiled a
function in MIPS16 mode when using -msynci.

How does this patch look?

Steve Ellcey
sellcey@mips.com


2012-07-19  Steve Ellcey  <sellcey@mips.com>

	* config/mips/mips.c (mips_set_mips16_mode): Clear SYNCI_MASK in
	MIPS16 mode.


diff --git a/gcc/config/mips/mips.c b/gcc/config/mips/mips.c
index 7356ce5..00360f7 100644
--- a/gcc/config/mips/mips.c
+++ b/gcc/config/mips/mips.c
@@ -15652,6 +15652,9 @@ mips_set_mips16_mode (int mips16_p)
       /* Switch to MIPS16 mode.  */
       target_flags |= MASK_MIPS16;
 
+      /* Turn off SYNCI if it was on, MIPS16 doesn't support it.  */
+      target_flags &= ~MASK_SYNCI;
+
       /* Don't run the scheduler before reload, since it tends to
          increase register pressure.  */
       flag_schedule_insns = 0;



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]