This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: User directed Function Multiversioning via Function Overloading (issue5752064)
- From: Xinliang David Li <davidxl at google dot com>
- To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Sriraman Tallam <tmsriram at google dot com>, mark at codesourcery dot com, nathan at codesourcery dot com, "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com>, reply at codereview dot appspotmail dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 09:08:48 -0700
- Subject: Re: User directed Function Multiversioning via Function Overloading (issue5752064)
- References: <20120307004630.A503DB21B6@azwildcat.mtv.corp.google.com> <CAAs8HmxrmBzsu6vejEhuequU0KYTDiCjg8HTxU1YuZ9wAm6PXA@mail.gmail.com> <CAMe9rOp_zzhPqYdzbJqRmLcDmcRo+fLS-RyDB6wB8K-uj8nu4Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAAs8HmwXAbwYbEaxvwA7KZx=454outzb-Cx4iifzZY9gB3Zx3w@mail.gmail.com> <CAAs8HmykJa+dM_efFRkL=7BTNQ5yzCEj1KyjKU_kTZNL2GefSQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMe9rOoaOyQyWfVwacYmSX7RjKRJmPdHT-o3ZuTmrwa9xpqygQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAAs8HmzZkx+FfZ=fcfnfG7Z7buF5+z_GN_gA4r_a_80NUuTzdg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMe9rOrdZaTDzakgpHxXWE3hhUvR7LNO1NkUrtAJJCjTjz_mjg@mail.gmail.com> <CAAs8Hmzw=tTGLypq1GQ7cA=DFupP8VpwB5QiE+jwLcYOovV=YQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAAs8HmzF0JJWPvFzoNGMSJ7ZS1h4KmROdx29-__8Oh9yUA1=JA@mail.gmail.com> <CAAs8HmxgMMVtCd9Xc4x_wJS80YCDrVFVRWsF3-G9uYjyE0OR6w@mail.gmail.com> <4FF7D1C6.90407@redhat.com> <CAAkRFZ+=y=nOAhAx9f5teUORsfAuVAYFuWCt4qf56DHZFo2uJw@mail.gmail.com> <4FF96D0C.5060406@redhat.com> <CAAkRFZKxLsJLr1Z23s8W=GTX+Or5=Cz2kTD9ySKJdjrRT8WGQQ@mail.gmail.com> <4FFBF9F5.6020306@redhat.com>
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 07/09/2012 11:27 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>>
>> Ok. Do you have specific comments on the patch?
>
>
> My comment is "Perhaps we want to implement this using a more generic
> mechanism." I was thinking to defer a detailed code review until that
> question is settled.
We all like more generic solutions :)
Sri, can you provide more descriptions on FE changes -- this will help
reviewers get started.
By the way, there are a couple of files with bad contents and needs
re-upload -- e.g, cp/decl.c.
thanks,
David
>
> Jason